View Single Post
Old 03-02-2006, 03:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
GrimmyMember

Marine

Semper Fi!
knucklehead

 
Grimmy's Avatar
 
Group:
Staff Advisor

GrimmyMember is Grimmy isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Mac
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 6,391
Threads: 428
UserID: 189
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  pisces  chinese_buffalo

Patriotism
My current mood: Grumpy
Reputation +/-Rep Power: 24
Points: 1334
Grimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud of
GrimmyMember is Grimmy isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: Army Reserve May Take Over Civil Affairs

Personally, I view any "push down" of active capability to reserve as a mistake.

Our reserve forces should be just that, reserve. They should not be "cheaper than active but full time" they should be for when the active is fully committed and some holes need patching.

Civil Affairs units have been a mainstay in many theaters recently, above and beyond Iraq and Afghanistan. These should all be active duty units. Any unit that's been called up since 9/11 should be replaced with an active duty unit in the standing force. We need more active duty units, not more units that should be active duty only, being pushed down into the reserve cause it's cheaper than payin for full time Soldiers.

The reserve should be cut roughly in half and used exclusivly and only as emergency (as in invasion of the US or full total global war) reinforcements.
The active duty military should be increased to be able to do the job necessary.

-Mac


Grimmy's Sig:Our country! in her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be in the right; but our country right or wrong!! ... Stephen Decatur, Toast

Grimmy isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)   Reply With Quote