Thread: Osprey Damaged
View Single Post
Old 03-28-2006, 08:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
GrimmyMember

Marine

Semper Fi!
knucklehead

 
Grimmy's Avatar
 
Group:
Staff Advisor

GrimmyMember is Grimmy isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Mac
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 6,391
Threads: 428
UserID: 189
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  pisces  chinese_buffalo

Patriotism
My current mood: Grumpy
Reputation +/-Rep Power: 24
Points: 1334
Grimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud ofGrimmy has much to be proud of
GrimmyMember is Grimmy isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: Osprey Damaged

^ design and concept wise, maybe. But dont forget that the basic concept of the rotory winged craft dates back, at least in part, to da vinci lol.

Aircraft "age" is an issue of frame stressors over time isnt it? (not being snarky, really asking. I know some of y'all work air craft and will know better than me)

Ospre is a "first of concept" craft. If its development and deployment fulfulls strategic/tactical/logistics needs (issues I really have no clue on) shouldnt it be persued? And if it no longer fulfills any of those needs, should it be dropped? Or should the concept be worked out to completion, just because it's a new thing and might be useful later?

Experiments with rotory winged craft started in the '30s (or there abouts) and we didnt get a real deployment and use of em until Korea in the early '50s. And the concept of "air mobile" warfare wasnt realized until Vietnam in the '60s.

-Mac


Grimmy's Sig:Our country! in her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be in the right; but our country right or wrong!! ... Stephen Decatur, Toast

Grimmy isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)   Reply With Quote