View Single Post
Old 10-27-2007, 06:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
TsunamiMember
Senior Member

 
Tsunami's Avatar
 
Group:
Operatations Sergeant

TsunamiMember is Tsunami isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 102
Threads: 34
UserID: 2707
User Info
United_States  army      

Childhood_Cancer
My current mood: Unspecified
Reputation +/-Rep Power: 2
Points: 10
Tsunami is on a distinguished road
TsunamiMember is Tsunami isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: Army Won't Field Rifle Deemed Superior to M4

I had the opportunity to shoot a 416 in NC at a contractors range that is currently all over the news... It's an amazing weapon, the HK rep buried it in sand and dunked it in water - each time the weapon performed flawlessly. Its ashame we can go drop a couple billion dollars on r&d while the soldier is forced to use an inferior weapon.
Let me be clear, I adore the AR-15 and have experienced minimal issues w/ the issue M-4. Considering the enemy is wielding the AK-47 - we are still in a good position. However - if there is technology available that can prevent a soldier's demise, the government owes it to the soldier to actively pursue that item, in this case - the HK 416.
I better be careful - starting to sound like a HK sales rep...


Tsunami's Sig:“You shouldn't underestimate an enemy, but it is just as fatal to overestimate him.”
GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.
Tsunami isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)   Reply With Quote