Home Portal Blog Links
Go Back   Military Forum > Military Forums: General Discussion > Armed Forces Discussions > Marine Corps Forums > Air Wings and Aviation Elements

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-04-2006, 09:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
Marine
MSgt USMC Ret

 
USMCRET6391's Avatar
 
Group:
Lieutenant General

USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Top
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,545
Threads: 3537
UserID: 69
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  taurus  

My current mood: Happy
Reputation +/-Power: 16
Points: 276
USMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the rough
USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Maintenance Eyed in V-22 Probe

InsideDefense.com NewsStand | Christopher J. Castelli | April 03, 2006


Naval officials looking into last week's MV-22 Osprey mishap are considering whether recent maintenance work done on the aircraft may have somehow contributed to the incident, according to a Marine Corps general and Pentagon sources.

The cause of the mishap remains undetermined, but the aircraft suffered “major damage to its wing and right engine” March 27 at New River, NC, according to a statement issued by the service after the incident. The aircraft damage “resulted from an inadvertent takeoff followed by a hard landing” on the base's flight line during a post-maintenance functional check flight, according to the statement.

“There was some sort of malfunction, engine malfunction and the result was damage -- severe damage to the wing and the engine cell,” Lt. Gen. Emerson Gardner, deputy commandant for programs and resources, told the Senate Armed Services seapower subcommittee at a hearing March 29.

“Of course the investigation is focused on the maintenance activities that took place that led to the requirement to do the functional check as well as the actions of the crew, which we always do in this case,” Gardner added.

Naval officials are also reviewing a particular incident in 2005 that is somewhat similar to the March 27 mishap, a service official told Inside the Navy . The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, did know the specifics.

The Pentagon approved plans to buy the Osprey in large numbers for the Marine Corps last year. This was a major milestone for the program, which was restructured after two fatal mishaps in 2000. The program has since had less serious mishaps, but no fatalities.

Maj. Shawn Haney, a spokeswoman for the 2nd Marine Air Wing at Cherry Point, NC, said the aircraft involved in the March 27 incident had undergone an “engine change” prior to the mishap. That does not necessarily mean an engine was replaced, but rather could mean an engine was removed for maintenance work and then reinstalled, according to Haney. She did not have further details on the maintenance work or the engine malfunction that occurred during the mishap.

A Pentagon source said the maintenance work might have led to unintentional problems, such as a wiring error. Pentagon and service sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Inside the Navy the inadvertent takeoff happened when the pilot switched modes for the Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) from automatic to manual. This switch, one of many planned steps during the ground portion of the check flight, should not have caused the Osprey to take flight. But the MV-22 suddenly rose about 30 feet in the air, Haney said. No one was hurt. Three people were aboard the aircraft at the time.

It is unclear whether the FADEC then reduced power, causing the aircraft to lower to the ground, or whether the pilot did that, the Pentagon source said.

Experts are considering whether a near-term software change should be made to address the issue of switching between FADEC modes, said a service official.

The incident has been labeled a class A mishap, which is the most serious and expensive kind. By definition, any mishap costing more than $1 million is in this category.

The Osprey damaged in the incident belongs to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Training Squadron 204. Haney declined to provide the identifying numbers for that particular aircraft.

The V-22's wings are designed to separate from the fuselage in certain crash situations for safety reasons. Some sources suggested a wing broke off in last week's mishap, but Haney would not say whether this occurred.

Following the mishap, the squadron ceased flying Ospreys for several days. Haney said flights resumed March 30.

The Marine Corps is investigating the incident. There will be two investigations -- one led by a mishap board at the squadron level and another by the judge advocate general at the Marine air group level.

Though no causes have been publicly identified, Navy acquisition executive Delores Etter downplayed the incident March 31 following an appearance on Capitol Hill.

Asked whether the mishap raises concerns about the program or whether the incident was a one-time fluke, Etter said, “Well that incident is under investigation so I couldn't speak to that, but the initial indication is that this is not something that is going to be a serious issue. So we're still feeling very confident about the MV-22.”

Navy V-22 spokesman James Darcy said the program office dispatched engineers to New River to support the mishap investigation and the fleet support team. But he declined to comment on the mishap.

Bell Helicopter Textron and Boeing build the Osprey mainly for the Marine Corps, but also for the Air Force component of U.S. Special Operations Command. Bell spokesman Bob Leder had no comment on the mishap and referred questions to the Marine Corps.

-Top
USMCRET6391 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

» Support the Site!

Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen
Reply

Tags
eyed, maintenance, probe, v22



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



New To The Site? Need Information?

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Designed by MilitaryDesign.Com
MilitaryLtd.com, GoInfantry.Com, Infantrymen.Net, Infantrymen's Military Forum are © 2000-2008 MilitaryLtd.Com. All Rights Reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents or images without express written consent is expressly prohibited.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253