Home Portal Blog Links
Go Back   Military Forum > Military Forums: General Discussion > Armed Forces Discussions > Marine Corps Forums > Air Wings and Aviation Elements

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-2006, 07:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
Marine
MSgt USMC Ret

 
USMCRET6391's Avatar
 
Group:
Lieutenant General

USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Top
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,545
Threads: 3537
UserID: 69
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  taurus  

My current mood: Happy
Reputation +/-Power: 16
Points: 276
USMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the rough
USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Analysts: Corps needs copters fast

By William Matthews
Staff report

For the Marines, whose equipment is being chewed up by the desert heat and sand, the “helicopter situation is dire,” say two defense analysts who have studied the effect of the war in Iraq on Marine Corps equipment and readiness.

The Corps has only 150 of the 160 CH-53E heavy-lift helicopters it needs, and may have to take another 15 out of service in 2010. Replacements aren’t expected to begin arriving before 2016, say Lawrence Korb and Max Bergmann of the Center for American Progress.

And the Corps’ CH-46Es, which average 46 years old, are wearing out faster than they can be replaced by MV-22s. The Corps plans to buy 360 MV-22s, but the problem-plagued tiltrotor aircraft won’t be in full production until the end of this decade, Korb said.

The Marines will almost certainly suffer a helicopter gap, he said.

To fill the gap, the Corps should buy “a couple hundred” H-60 helicopters flown by the Army or H-92 helicopters flown by the Air Force, and 10 to 20 heavy-lift helicopters, Korb said.

The MV-22 has been in development since 1983, and has “experienced significant technical and cost problems,” he said. The Marines have become “too dependent on a single airframe — the MV-22 — and now face critical shortages as a result.”

The war is also grinding down a wide range of other Marine Corps equipment, said Korb and Bergmann.

Forty percent of the Corps’ ground equipment and 50 percent of its communications gear is in Iraq, where it is being used up to nine times planned rates. To maintain readiness in Iraq, the Corps is taking equipment from non-deployed units and depleting prepositioned weapons and supplies, the pair said in a 25-page report issued Aug. 23.

The Marines need $6.8 billion for repairing and replacing war-damaged equipment in 2007, and should receive at least $5.3 billion for that purpose each year they remain in Iraq, the report says.

The experience in Iraq should also prompt the Marines to reconsider how much lighter and more mobile it really wants to be, Korb said.

“Tanks and armored personnel carriers have been out of favor with the advocates of military transformation for so long that their value and versatility in Iraq has come as something of a revelation,” the report says.

“Not only have they provided critical capabilities in waging urban battles, but they have proven surprisingly relevant in the conduct of counterinsurgency operations.”

Iraq has demonstrated that heavy armor remains important, Korb said.

Thus, the Marines should consider buying Stryker armored vehicles that the Army now uses in addition to the Light Armored Vehicles that Marines now operate, Korb said. The Marines should also develop a plan for enhancement of its Abrams tanks, he said.

Overall, the Marine Corps needs more money, Korb said.

The Corps’ share of the Navy budget should increase from 14 percent to 17 percent. The Navy is asking Congress for $128.3 billion for 2007.

-Top
USMCRET6391 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

» Support the Site!

Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen
Reply

Tags
analysts, copters, corps, fast



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Battle of Gettysburg (July 1 – July 3, 1863), USMCRET6391 General Military History 0 07-02-2006 01:58 PM
The 'Burning Shame' of Chancellorsville USMCRET6391 General Military History 0 05-09-2006 09:36 AM
United States Marine Corps USMCRET6391 Tun Tavern 0 04-20-2006 01:53 PM
History of the Marine Corps' Birthday Celebration Infantrymen Tun Tavern 10 11-10-2005 11:53 AM
CMC: Changes in Corps' Future Will Benefit Marines USMCRET6391 Tun Tavern 5 10-27-2005 02:55 PM


New To The Site? Need Information?

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Designed by MilitaryDesign.Com
MilitaryLtd.com, GoInfantry.Com, Infantrymen.Net, Infantrymen's Military Forum are © 2000-2008 MilitaryLtd.Com. All Rights Reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents or images without express written consent is expressly prohibited.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253