Home Portal Blog Links
Go Back   Military Forum > Military Forums: General Discussion > Armed Forces Discussions > Army Forums > Army General Discussion

Army General Discussion Discuss anything Army!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2005, 06:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
Military Police

 
333MP's Avatar
 
Group:
Command Chief Infantrymen

333MPMember is 333MP isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Brenda
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 1,581
Threads: 178
UserID: 205
User Info
United_States  army  female  gemini  

Pro_Choice
My current mood: Wonderful
Reputation +/-Power: 6
Points: 39
333MP is on a distinguished road
333MPMember is 333MP isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Army Officials Voice Concern Over Shortfall In Recruitment

New York Times
March 4, 2005

Army Officials Voice Concern Over Shortfall In Recruitment

By Eric Schmitt

WASHINGTON, March 3 - The Army is so short of new recruits that for first time in nearly five years it failed in February to fill its monthly quota of volunteers sent to boot camp. Army officials called it the latest ominous sign of the Iraq war's impact on the military's ability to enlist fresh troops.

"We're very concerned about it," Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday when asked about recruiting shortfalls in the active-duty Army and Army Reserve. "When people ask you what you worry about the most, I say there's just two words: people and money."

In February, the active-duty Army shipped 5,114 recruits to boot camp, 27 percent below its goal of 7,050; it was the first time since May 2000 that the Army missed a monthly goal. For the first five months of the current fiscal year, the Army has met 94 percent of its goal of 29,185 new soldiers in basic training. Over all, the Army plans to bring in 80,000 new recruits this year - 3,000 more than last year - to replace soldiers who retire or do not re-enlist.

S. Douglas Smith, a spokesman for the Army Recruiting Command, attributed the decline in February to an improving economy that siphoned off potential soldiers and the news coverage of the violence in Iraq, which so far has claimed about 1,500 American lives. The Army's February drop-off was reported on Thursday by USA Today.

Army officials insisted on Thursday that increased recruiting efforts, including hundreds of additional recruiters and re-enlistment bonuses of up to $20,000, would help the Army meet its overall annual recruiting targets.

"We're not pushing the panic button yet," Col. Joseph Curtin, an Army spokesman, said. "The Army is banking on the traditional summer surge of new recruits."

But some independent military personnel specialists warned that the traditional kinds of incentives that have cured recruiting woes in peacetime had never been tested in a prolonged war with large overseas combat deployments.

"What we don't know is if the old tools - more recruiters, bonuses and education benefits - will work in the same way as they have in the past," said Beth J. Asch, a senior economist specializing in military personnel issues at the RAND Corporation, a military-financed research organization.

The Army's problem has been developing for several months as the pool of volunteers who have agreed to enter service after a specified delay has shrunk and as the Army pushes new volunteers into service as fast as possible. Recruits signing up now typically wait about 50 days before shipping out to boot camp, compared with 110 days last year.

The Marine Corps, the main provider of ground troops in Iraq, is also facing unexpected recruiting strains. The Marine Recruiting Command said on Thursday that in February it narrowly missed its contracting goal, the number of recruits signed up but not yet shipped to basic training, for the second straight month.

But the Marine Corps actually exceeded its target for new recruits shipped to boot camp in February, and is slightly ahead of its overall goal for the year.

In another sign of the strain, five of the six military reserve components failed to meet their recruiting goals for the first four months of the current fiscal year.

Marine and Army officials expressed confidence that they would meet their overall recruiting needs for the year, but acknowledged that the contract numbers could be a sign of trouble ahead.

"Does that mean in the future we won't have as many to ship? You bet," Lt. Gen. Jan C. Huly, the Marines' deputy commandant for plans, police and operations, and a former top Marine recruiter, said in an interview. "If we don't pick up that contracting, it will."

Top Pentagon officials acknowledged that the graphic images of casualties from Iraq and the obvious danger of serving there had caused many parents to advise their children to avoid joining the military now.

"That's a factor, that we're a nation at war," Lawrence Di Rita, the chief Pentagon spokesman, told reporters on Thursday. "If it's a young kid who's in high school and contemplating his future, what are his parents advising him?"

Mr. Di Rita added, "I mean, without question, when there's the kind of coverage that there has been about casualties - and we certainly mourn all the casualties, but they are covered, there's prominent media coverage of casualties in Iraq - parents factor those kinds of things in to what they want their children doing."

General Huly and other top Pentagon officials said that while recruiting efforts might be faltering at the moment, re-enlistment rates, especially among combat-hardened units, remained exceedingly strong.

-Brenda
333MP isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

» Support the Site!

Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen
Reply

Tags
army, concern, officials, recruitment, shortfall, voice



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



New To The Site? Need Information?

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Designed by MilitaryDesign.Com
MilitaryLtd.com, GoInfantry.Com, Infantrymen.Net, Infantrymen's Military Forum are © 2000-2008 MilitaryLtd.Com. All Rights Reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents or images without express written consent is expressly prohibited.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253