|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||
|
Army
Arsenic
is AKA: Dave
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: FT Stewart GA
Posts: 11
Threads: 4 UserID: 2079 |
Oakley boot regs
I'm thinking about getting a pair of the Oakley SI Assault boots to replace my busted up desert bellevelles(since supply wont issue me any!) and cant find anything in the 670-1 saying I CANT wear them. Does anyone know the regs on what kind of boots can be worn?
-Dave |
||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
» Support the Site! |
Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
2LT, Armor Scary
is Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 150
Threads: 11 UserID: 130 |
Re: Oakley boot regs
Hey,
I was looking at the regs earlier today at this site: http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:...s&ct=clnk&cd=2 Check paragraphs 5E1 and 5E2 - if for whatever reason the site doesn't work, try a google search for this phrase: [DA Message Army Combat Uniform Ensemble] - it should be the second address listed. Hopefully this helps a little. E.S. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
It's our job to arrange the meeting
BTDT RR691983
is AKA: JR
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 11,545
Threads: 63 UserID: 31 |
Re: Oakley boot regs
I know it was put out about 2 months into the deployment it is against a new revisi on to 670-1, yet I still see lotsa guard soldiers wearin them.
-JR |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| boot, oakley, regs |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| New To The Site? | Need Information? |