Home Portal News Links
Go Back   Military Forum > Military Forums: General Discussion > Armed Forces Discussions > Marine Corps Forums > The Marine Notebook

The Marine Notebook Stories from the Marine Corps

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2006, 09:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Marine
MSgt USMC Ret

 
USMCRET6391's Avatar
 
Group:
Lieutenant General

USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 is offline
AKA: Top
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,528
Threads: 3535
UserID: 69
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  taurus  

My current mood: Happy
Reputation +/-Power: 20
Points: 276
USMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the rough
USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 is offline  

U.S., Japan agree on relocation costs

TOKYO — Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said Friday that Tokyo is ready to shoulder part of the cost to relocate thousands of Marines from a southern Japanese island to Guam as part of a U.S. military realignment plan.

Koizumi did not specify the amount but said Japan’s contribution is to help relieve some of Okinawa’s burden of hosting most of 50,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan.

“In order to reduce Okinawa’s burden with U.S. military bases, Japan is ready to shoulder the cost to a certain extent,” Koizumi told a parliamentary budget committee. “We will further negotiate to determine the amount.”

Japanese media have reported that the United States has asked Japan to cover 75 percent of the estimated $7.6 billion needed for the partial relocation of the Marines. But Koizumi refused to specify the figures.

“The United States has presented its views, but Japan has its own, and we plan to convey that,” he added.

Residents near the troop installations, particularly on Okinawa, have long opposed their presence citing the crowding, noise and crime associated with the bases.

In 1995, an uproar over the rape of a 12-year-old girl by three U.S. servicemen on Japan’s southern island of Okinawa triggered massive protests and led to the relocation of an air base to a less densely populated part of the prefecture.

“Reduction of the U.S. Marines (on Okinawa) has been a desperate hope of the Okinawan people. As (Japan’s payment) contributes to a large reduction of Okinawa’s burdens, it would be desirable to achieve the relocation as quickly as possible,” Defense Agency chief Fukushiro Nukaga was quoted by Kyodo News agency as telling the parliamentary committee.

The unprecedented spending for another country’s military would require a parliamentary approval via a special law.

Tokyo and Washington concluded an interim agreement on the realignment, and a final pact is due at the end of March.

But the plan has raised local opposition.

Iwakuni, in southern Japan, solidly rejected the proposal in a plebiscite on Sunday, and the mayor urged Tokyo on Thursday to scrap the plan.

The proposal would transfer some 7,000 Marines from Okinawa to the U.S. Pacific island territory of Guam and require the construction of a runway in another part of the island.

It would also boost troop numbers and upgrade facilities at a U.S. Army base south of Tokyo, and move the air wing from the carrier Kitty Hawk, now based near Zama at Atsugi city, to Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni.

American troops have been stationed in Japan since the end of World War II in 1945.

-Top
USMCRET6391 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

» Support the Site!

Military Clothing - Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen
Reply

Tags
agree, costs, japan, relocation


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



New To The Site? Need Information?

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., SEO by vBSEO
Designed by MilitaryLtd.Com
MilitaryLtd.com, GoInfantry.Com, Infantrymen.Net, Infantrymen's Military Forum are Copyright ©2000 - , MilitaryLtd.Com. All Rights Reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents or images without express written consent is expressly prohibited.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245