Home Portal Blog Links
Go Back   Military Forum > Military Forums: General Discussion > Armed Forces Discussions > Army Forums > Military Police

Military Police Assist, protect, and defend

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2004, 04:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
D
Guest

 
D's Avatar
 
D is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 2369
User Info
        

D is  

MP vs Security Forces

I’m working with Air Force Security Forces troops nowadays and many of them are thinking about going blue to green. The question that they have been asking me (and I’m passing on to you) is how do army MPs deploy? Are there specific companies (or other unit types) that don’t have regular policing/security duties when at there home station and just train or is it like the AF where you will work gates and patrols until you get the chance to deploy as an individual in a thrown together task force? These guys are set on getting more training and unit cohesion from the Army so the answer to this could make the difference for about 12 potential solders.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2004, 06:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
Old Salt

 
Navy6064's Avatar
 
Group:
Sr. Infantrymen General

Navy6064Special Member is Navy6064 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: US
Posts: 22,947
Threads: 4588
UserID: 6
User Info
United_States  navy  male  aquarius  chinese_snake

USA_Support
My current mood: Happy
Reputation +/-Power: 42
Points: 1246
Navy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud ofNavy6064 has much to be proud of
Navy6064Special Member is Navy6064 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

This might help your?


Artillery, armor units training to deploy as MPs

By Spc. William Addison and Staff Sgt. Pascual Flores
Spc. Chris Duffy, left, and Spc. Robert Groves, 107th Field Artillery, Pennsylvania National Guard, experience the fire power of an MK-19 40mm automatic grenade launcher at Range 59C, Fort Dix, N.J., as they train to deploy for a military police mission.
Staff Sgt. Pascual Flores


FORT DIX, N.J. (Army News Service, Jan. 28, 2004) -- Artillerymen normally pride themselves on their weapons, so when about 2,500 National Guard members were informed they were being deployed without their howitzers, it came as a shock.

Fort Dix has been designated a mobilization and training center for field artillery and armor units that are being deployed for missions normally performed by military police companies, said Col. Lonnie Barham, chief of the Strategic Mobility Division at Dix. Other artillery units have been training in MP skills at Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., home of the Military Police School.

The National Guard units chosen for this new mission designated “in lieu of,” hail from various states from as far west as Texas and spanning the east coast from New Hampshire and Vermont to Florida.

Eleven National Guard units are already training at Fort Dix, including guardsmen from New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. The post expects the remaining units to arrive within the next 6-8 weeks.

While at Dix, the units will go through the normal mobilization process, such as the Soldier Readiness Check center that includes medical and dental evaluations, inoculations, and a full administrative review.

Then for the next 40 days, MP training will be conducted by various elements of the 78th Division (Training Support), from Edison, N.J. Soldiers whose passion is making grid squares disappear will learn new skills outside of their military occupational specialty.

Specifically, the Soldiers will be training in two aspects of the MP field, Maneuver and Mobility Support Operations, and Area Security operations. Some of the tasks include route reconnaissance and surveillance, convoy escorts, mounted and dismounted patrols and cordon and search techniques to name just a few.

The artillerymen will also be required to qualify on much smaller weapons than they are used to, including the M-16 or M-4 carbine, M-9 pistol, MK-19 40mm automatic grenade launcher, M-203 grenade launcher, AT-4 anti-tank weapon and M-249 Squad Automatic Weapon, know as the SAW.

Most of the Soldiers training for this new mission welcomed the new experience.

“My 3rd Platoon ‘Scorpions,’ are in high spirit on this new mission and their high morale even surprises me, said 1st Lt. West Martin, 112th Field Artillery, New Jersey National Guard.

“We have been at the ranges for the past week learning all types of weapons,” West said. “Guards are familiar with rifles and pistols, but now we are getting proficient and comfortable with the Army’s vast array of individual and crew-served weapons.”

“As Guardsmen, we partake in civil disturbance training once a year and in October 2001 we were mobilized for Operation Noble Eagle, tasked with providing security at airports, bridges and tunnels,” West said.

With all the changes going on within the Army, Soldiers like those in the 172nd New Hampshire National Guard have learned to cope with the pace.

“The key to our success is what we have been told all along -- be flexible,” said Sgt. Brad Mills about his unit’s ability to learn the new skills. “With every obstacle there’s something to overcome and we are used to being adaptive,” he added.

“I think everyone who’s in the artillery would rather tow a M-198 behind them, but a mission is a mission,” said Sgt. Bill Chaussee, also of the 172nd.

“It came as a disappointment,” said Sgt. 1st Class Thomas McGee, platoon sergeant for 4th Platoon, 172nd Field Artillery from New Hampshire. “There are a lot of us that love artillery, but we can adjust.”

Also participating in this training are guardsmen from Pennsylvania armor and air defense units.
Navy6064 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2004, 07:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
Navy

 
Field_Sailor's Avatar
 
Group:
Ensign

Field_SailorNavy is Field_Sailor isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Rich
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Meade, MD
Posts: 3,380
Threads: 159
UserID: 95
User Info
United_States  department_of_defense  male  cancer  chinese_rooster

Patriotism
My current mood: Wonderful
Reputation +/-Power: 11
Points: 345
Field_Sailor is a jewel in the roughField_Sailor is a jewel in the roughField_Sailor is a jewel in the roughField_Sailor is a jewel in the rough
Field_SailorNavy is Field_Sailor isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

Can the Guard do BTG? Or are they going active?

-Rich


Field_Sailor's Sig:
For God has not given me the Spirit of Fear!

There is No Greater Love than This, that a Man Lay down His Life for His Friends. John 15:13.
Field_Sailor isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 06:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
D
Guest

 
D's Avatar
 
D is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 2369
User Info
        

D is  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

I think that my post might have been unclear. I am an ARNG artillerists called up to augment an AF Security Forces squadron. The personnel that I work with are active duty Air Force who are dissatisfied with their service. They want to stay active but they want to be in an environment where they get to train on a regular basis and where they will get deployed with there unit instead of troops that they have never met. Pardon any confusion, I’m still getting used to righting in the forum format.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 03:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
Navy

 
Field_Sailor's Avatar
 
Group:
Ensign

Field_SailorNavy is Field_Sailor isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Rich
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Meade, MD
Posts: 3,380
Threads: 159
UserID: 95
User Info
United_States  department_of_defense  male  cancer  chinese_rooster

Patriotism
My current mood: Wonderful
Reputation +/-Power: 11
Points: 345
Field_Sailor is a jewel in the roughField_Sailor is a jewel in the roughField_Sailor is a jewel in the roughField_Sailor is a jewel in the rough
Field_SailorNavy is Field_Sailor isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

I get ya now. I was just curious thanks.

-Rich
Field_Sailor isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2004, 03:00 AM   #6 (permalink)
Marine

 
USMC Chuter's Avatar
 
Group:
Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps

USMC ChuterMarine is USMC Chuter isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NW US
Posts: 2,739
Threads: 103
UserID: 175
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  cancer  

My current mood: Withdrawn
Reputation +/-Power: 7
Points: 56
USMC Chuter will become famous soon enough
USMC ChuterMarine is USMC Chuter isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

D, I'll try to answer your question as best I can. I don't claim to be a scholar on MP affairs, but I'll fill you in on what I've seen. In the Marines, there are "field" MP's and "garrison" MP's. Field MP's are generally assigned to MP companies in deployable units, while garrison MP's are assigned directly to the base itself. Field MP's are greater in numbers and generally concentrate on force protection, EPW, convoy escort roles, etc.. Garrison MP's usually concentrate on gate duties and law enforcement functions on base.

During my unfortunate stint in the ARNG, the MP's I saw were mostly of the field variety, attached to the brigade I was a part of. They trained primarily for force protection, escort, etc.. On occasion you'd see them augmenting the Air Force gate guard types, but I never saw them participating in base law enforcement functions. That particular ARNG brigade is now deployed, and the MP contingent went with them, in a field role. Hope this helps.


USMC Chuter's Sig:Let No Man Harm Me With Impunity
USMC Chuter isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2004, 01:00 PM   #7 (permalink)
Fred93GT
Guest

 
Fred93GT's Avatar
 
Fred93GT is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 2369
User Info
        

Fred93GT is  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

Yes you will deploy with a unit be it a company, battallion or brigade sized element. I'm in a battallion and our whole unit deployed to Guantanamo in 02, we were actually split up according to where the JTF needed us.....MPs worked camp delta, MI guys worked in the camp too, supply guys worked in the camp and in the warehouses, admin (personell)guys typically worked outside the camp. Deployments also depend on what your unit's mission is......I am in an EPW (enemy prisoner of war) unit so we will most likely be babysitting again on our next deployment, BUT we could end up doing any MP mission, we will find out when the time comes.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2005, 06:51 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member

 
SPC_Thomas's Avatar
 
Group:
Trooper

SPC_ThomasMember is SPC_Thomas isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 10
Threads: 0
UserID: 917
User Info
United_States  army  male  libra  chinese_horse

Cancer
My current mood: Happy
Reputation +/-Power: 0
Points: 10
SPC_Thomas is on a distinguished road
SPC_ThomasMember is SPC_Thomas isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

While in Iraq i ran into three specific type of MP's. One was the guys running up and down the roads patroling mounted in vehicles. Another were running around the larger posts acting as garrison police while others manned the gates and patroled the outskirts of the AO. the Thrid type was the Infantry, Artillery, Combat Service Support guys that were either cross trained or just found themselves in that job by virtue of being there. I know this doesnt answer your question too well but unfortunaly there is no set answer. If they were to become MP's in the Army, they would probably deploy with their own unit. unless they possess some spec ASI which would make them more likely to depoy sooner then the rest of thier unit.
SPC_Thomas isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2005, 07:31 AM   #9 (permalink)
Army
Cavalry Trooper

 
MACTANK's Avatar
 
Group:
Staff Sergeant

MACTANKArmy is MACTANK isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Waterford, Michigan
Posts: 357
Threads: 70
UserID: 914
User Info
United_States  army  male  libra  chinese_rooster

My current mood: carefree
Reputation +/-Power: 4
Points: 13
MACTANK is on a distinguished road
MACTANKArmy is MACTANK isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred93GT
Yes you will deploy with a unit be it a company, battallion or brigade sized element. I'm in a battallion and our whole unit deployed to Guantanamo in 02, we were actually split up according to where the JTF needed us.....MPs worked camp delta, MI guys worked in the camp too, supply guys worked in the camp and in the warehouses, admin (personell)guys typically worked outside the camp. Deployments also depend on what your unit's mission is......I am in an EPW (enemy prisoner of war) unit so we will most likely be babysitting again on our next deployment, BUT we could end up doing any MP mission, we will find out when the time comes.
You must be out of the Inkster unit. My daughter is deployed to Guantanimo with that unit now.


MACTANK's Sig: TOUJOURS PRET!
MACTANK isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2005, 12:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Air Force
TSgt

 
USAFDefender's Avatar
 
Group:
First Sergeant

USAFDefenderAir Force is USAFDefender isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Jorge
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fairchild
Posts: 509
Threads: 22
UserID: 210
User Info
United_States  air_force  male  virgo  chinese_monkey

POW_MIA
My current mood: Spoiled
Reputation +/-Power: 5
Points: 37
USAFDefender is on a distinguished road
USAFDefenderAir Force is USAFDefender isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

I seriously considered B2G and the warrant officer program not too long ago. The only thing that stopped me was when I heard most units were sitting in Iraq 13+ months. With a wife and two young kids...no thank you.

-Jorge


USAFDefender's Sig:

We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
-George Orwell
USAFDefender isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2005, 01:05 PM   #11 (permalink)
Air Force

 
Rusty24's Avatar
 
Group:
Second Lieutenant

Rusty24Air Force is Rusty24 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 3,128
Threads: 401
UserID: 136
User Info
United_States  air_force  male  pisces  chinese_dragon

My current mood: Moody
Reputation +/-Power: 0
Points: 0
Rusty24 is an unknown quantity at this point
Rusty24Air Force is Rusty24 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

You might want to let them know that a majority of individuals that are doing the blue to green are loosing a stripe. Plus, they are seeing what Army MP's do as far as deployments ..... OK ...... so that is what they are doing there. They fail to realize what they will be doing back stateside ....... I.E. JRTC, NTC, local field exercises, hurry up and wait blah, blah, blah.

I really think that the majority of these cats do not realize what they are getting into when they do this switch over. If they do ...... more power to them. Atleast they are not getting out and becoming an anti-war protester.

I have seen and been on both sides of the fence. I have done my fair share on JRTC's and two NTC's. I have been there for Purple Dragons and Brigade FTX's. I have also done the MOPP 4 for 5 hours in 100 degree temps.

If they do want to make the swap, good on them, but make sure they have it on paper EXACTLY what they will be getting when they cross.


Rusty24's Sig:*

Rusty24 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

» Support the Site!

Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen
Old 03-09-2005, 02:38 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
Military Police

 
333MP's Avatar
 
Group:
Command Chief Infantrymen

333MPMember is 333MP isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
AKA: Brenda
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 1,581
Threads: 178
UserID: 205
User Info
United_States  army  female  gemini  

Pro_Choice
My current mood: Wonderful
Reputation +/-Power: 6
Points: 39
333MP is on a distinguished road
333MPMember is 333MP isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: MP vs Security Forces

Quote:
If they do want to make the swap, good on them, but make sure they have it on paper EXACTLY what they will be getting when they cross.
I totaly agree. Being an MP is a great job. As an E-4 you could be leading you own team, which is the general element of MP's. Anything beyone E-4 you might loose rank and that would suck.

-Brenda
333MP isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
forces, security



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On