|
|||||||
| Ships Ammunition, Amphibious Assault, Amphibious Transport Dock, Carriers, Cruisers, Destroyers, Frigates, MineHunter, Support |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||
|
Guest
searayman is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 4106 |
I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
ok i believe the Navy should bring back pt boats but faster and more heavily armed!!
i thought they were very efective in wwII so why did they even stop useing them? |
||
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||
|
Navy
Field_Sailor
is AKA: Rich
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Meade, MD
Posts: 3,380
Threads: 159 UserID: 95 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
We have boats that do the missions that are needed. Coastal security is done by the CG. We have what we need.
Quote:
-Rich |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
Guest
searayman is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 4106 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
ya but they are like 170 feet in length and kind of high in the water, if we had about an 80-90 fott boat that sat low in the water then it whoulf be a heck of a lot faster,and we stick some machine guns and torpedo tubes on it and we got a really efective patrol boat for guarding ships, and fighting in littoral areas.
|
||
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Navy
Field_Sailor
is AKA: Rich
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Meade, MD
Posts: 3,380
Threads: 159 UserID: 95 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
We have RHIB for that stype of security. We have smaller boats also. I believe our inventory is fine. What would we use them for? Who would staff them? The Navy is down-sizing (err, "right-sizing").
-Rich |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
U.S. Army Ranger ![]() 1st Bn / 75th Inf TIBTLS Covertness
is Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 8,502
Threads: 30 UserID: 12 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
Ya'll ought to bring back the BBs. What's in the inventory today that can do shore bombardment better? Talk about kickin' in the door!
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
Navy
Field_Sailor
is AKA: Rich
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Meade, MD
Posts: 3,380
Threads: 159 UserID: 95 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
That I'll agree with.
Main Gun Battery Nine 16"/50 Caliber guns in three gun turrets Range: 23 miles Projectiles: Armor piercing 2,700 lb. High capacity 1,900 lb. Powder: Six 110 lb. Bags Rate of fire: Two rounds per minute per gun Use: Anti-surface, shore bombardment Secondary Gun Twelve 5"/38 caliber guns in six twin mounts Range 9 miles Projectiles: 55 lb. Powder: 30 lb. Rate of fire: Fifteen rounds per minute per gun Use: Anti-surface, anti-air, shore bombardment Air Defense Four Phalanx Close-In Weapons Systems capable of firing 20mm ammunition at a rate of 50 rounds per second for self-defense against missiles and aircraft. Missiles Tomahawk: Capable of carrying (32) land attack or anti-ship cruise missiles in eight armored box launchers. Harpoon: Capable of carrying (16) anti-ship missiles in canister mounts. DAMN DAMN DAMN -Rich |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||
|
Guest
searayman is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 4106 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
are the bb's the huge battelships?
is they are i would love those back too!!!! But why did we decomission all those too? Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
|
Guest
searayman is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 4106 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
ok i found a list pf the navy's small craft.
http://www.military.com/Resources/EQ...ft&cat=v&lev=2 Only the Mk V SOC is heavily armed and that is only used by the SWCC and it dosent have torpedose. :gunsnedt |
||
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | ||
|
Guest
searayman is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 4106 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
to take down other boats
|
||
|
| Sponsored Links |
» Support the Site! |
Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen |
|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||
|
U.S. Army Ranger ![]() 1st Bn / 75th Inf TIBTLS Covertness
is Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 8,502
Threads: 30 UserID: 12 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
Where the Navy's going they don't need torp.s on their ships. Welcome to the 21st century.
And yes, the BBs are the battleships. More specific to my reference and Field Sailor's stats, the Iowa class battleships. (In my best Joe Piscapo voice....) This one shoots through schools. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||
|
Navy
Field_Sailor
is AKA: Rich
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Meade, MD
Posts: 3,380
Threads: 159 UserID: 95 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
Lovin it...
We have subs to hunt subs. The type of boats you are referring to would not be in open waters, that is why we have Frigates, Destroyers and Cruisers. And a RHIB Boat armed with enough pissed off Sailors because you woke them from a nice dream and M16's, M9's and "other stuff" is plenty weaponry for the type of missions those Sailors take on. -Rich |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||
|
Navy
Field_Sailor
is AKA: Rich
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Meade, MD
Posts: 3,380
Threads: 159 UserID: 95 |
Re: I think the Navy should bring Back PT boats!!!
Not laughing. These are not the old days. We are more fit handle specialized missions. Our Sailors that do boardings get top notch training. They are prepared and equiped!
-Rich |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| back, boats, bring, navy |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| New To The Site? | Need Information? |