Home Portal Blog Links
Go Back   Military Forum > Military Forums: General Discussion > Armed Forces Discussions > Marine Corps Forums > U.S. Marine Corps Special Operations- Capable Units > Special Operations Training Group (SOTG)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2004, 01:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
U.S. Marine ( FAST )

 
SR-25's Avatar
 
Group:
Second Lieutenant

Space Marine
SR-25Member is SR-25 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,131
Threads: 746
UserID: 193
User Info
United_States  marine_corps      

Patriotism
My current mood: Pissed
Reputation +/-Power: 6
Points: 18
SR-25 is on a distinguished road
SR-25Member is SR-25 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

New SOCOM Detachment

There was no sub-profile for the new USMC SOCOM Detachment so I decided to put it in here. Does any one know the qualifications you must have to get into it?


SR-25's Sig:Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


"Fallujans have now been offered a choice: hand over the outsiders or get blown apart by the world's most lethal killing machine, the U.S. Marines!"


"Heaven Won't Take Marines and Hell Is Afraid They'll Take Over."


US Marines: Travel agents to Allah.

Call your lawyer, I'll beat the shit out of him after I beat the fuck out of you!- Vin Diesel " A Man Apart"


Improvise, Adapt, Overcome ~SEMPER FI!~

SR-25 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2004, 02:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Marine

 
USMC Chuter's Avatar
 
Group:
Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps

USMC ChuterMarine is USMC Chuter isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NW US
Posts: 2,739
Threads: 103
UserID: 175
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  cancer  

My current mood: Withdrawn
Reputation +/-Power: 7
Points: 56
USMC Chuter will become famous soon enough
USMC ChuterMarine is USMC Chuter isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: New SOCOM Detachment

Don't know for sure, but I'll paraphrase.. You gotta be in the top percentage of performers in Force Recon and/or have excelled beyond your peers in a mission-essential specialty.. Beyond that you have to successfully undergo whatever selection process they have established for the detachment.
USMC Chuter isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

» Support the Site!

Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen
Old 09-21-2004, 04:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
owen
Guest

 
owen's Avatar
 
owen is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 2369
User Info
        

owen is  

Re: New SOCOM Detachment

i dont know the requirment per say but i have heard rumors that its mostly hand-picked guys at this point maybe after they are operational they might make a selection course although anyone of the hand-picked guys are probably in the top 1 percentile of the corps so any selection course wouldnt be too difficult for them
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 11:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
DSumner
Guest

 
DSumner's Avatar
 
DSumner is
Posts: n/a
Threads: 2369
User Info
        

DSumner is  

Re: New SOCOM Detachment

Military mum on fate of Marine commandos

By: DARRIN MORTENSON - Staff Writer

Even as the two-year trial period for the Marine Corps' new special operations unit winds down, military officials remain tight-lipped about whether Detachment One, as it is known, will join the ranks of America's elite forces alongside the Army's Green Berets and the Navy's SEALs.

The 86-man unit, formed at Camp Pendleton in June of 2003 and which later trained at Coronado Naval Amphibious Base, was deployed in April 2004 to Iraq for a combat trial under the provisional command of the unified U.S. Special Operations Command.

The military has so far refused to comment on how or what the 81 Marines and five Navy Corpsmen of Detachment One performed in the field.

And since the unit returned to San Diego late last year, military officials have refused to say whether Detachment One will survive or ever formally join the world of special operations.

"Nothing is releasable on that yet," the special operations spokesman, Ken McGraw, said in response to a recent request for an update on the Marine detachment.

That was the same terse response recently given by Marine Corps officials and the spokesman for the Navy's special warfare command at Coronado, where Detachment One was trained.

One reason for the secrecy is that the unit's future is at the heart of an emotional debate over who controls what in the military, said Jay Farrar, a former Marine officer and military analyst for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The debate boils down to whether the Marine Corps should formally join the special operations community or merely continue contributing to joint operations on an ad hoc basis as it has in Afghanistan, Eastern Europe and, most recently, Iraq, Farrar said in a telephone interview Tuesday.

The already lean Corps wants to maintain formal control of its troops and equipment, especially its aircraft for close air support, but continue to lend forces to joint missions, he said

"It's not about capabilities," Farrar said, adding that the Marine Corps has worked well with other special operations forces all over the world. "It's the jurisdiction."

The special operations command, based in Tampa, Fla., was formed in the late 1980s and includes units from every service but the Marine Corps.

The Army provided Special Forces, Delta Force, Rangers, specialized helicopter units, psychological operations and civil affairs teams. The Navy contributed the SEALs and other special maritime units. And the Air Force created its helicopter and AC-130 gunship squadrons equipped for the special operations team.

While the Marine Corps refused to contribute more than a handful of staff officers, it restructured some of its force to fit the special operations mold and participate in joint operations when needed.

Since then, the war on terror and ongoing counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq have put a strain on existing special operations forces, and the Marines have been under increasing pressure to formally contribute to the elite global command.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who has insisted that the military become lighter and more agile to fight non-state forces such as terrorists, has emphasized special operations and joint missions and is pushing Marine officials to join the special operations command, military analysts say.

Recent missions in Iraq have only hardened the Marines insistence that it not relinquish control of its best troops to the joint command, Farrar said.

"In their view, the Marines are saying: 'We can't afford to give these people up. If you take these units now, then we won't have use of them when we get a special mission, as we often do.' "

He said the Marine Corps was not being "obstructionist," but based its position on the need to remain flexible.

While Detachment One may have passed muster in Iraq, Farrar said he still doubts the Marines would want to join the special operations command.

Recent comments by top Marine brass seem to bear him out.

Lt. Gen. Wallace Gregson, commander of all Marine forces in the Pacific, said the debate over including the Marines in the larger group is more about control of budgets and political control than about the capability of the Marines to perform.

"There is a high degree of emotion on all sides of this issue," Gregson said in a recent article in the journal Sea Power.

Gregson, whose command includes Detachment One, said he believed the Marines can integrate with the special operations command without relinquishing control over the Corps' newest elite unit. He said the Corps could provide a unit for the joint mission, on condition that the Corps gets it back.

"They (Detachment One) brought a unique task organization over there, and they showed how, in all aspects of organization, very highly selected and very highly trained units like that can be of great value," Gregson, said, according to the April edition of Sea Power. "That's a mirror to the Marine Corps' approach to warfare in general. ... Tell us what capabilities you want, what kind of unit you want, and we'll provide."

Marine Corps Commandant Michael Hagee, in another article in Sea Power, echoed Gregson and said he prefers the status quo, which he said worked well during the U.S. assault on Fallujah in November.

Our "relationship between SOCOM and the Marine Corps in-theatre ---- Iraq, Afghanistan ---- is really, really good," he said. "It is seamless now; it is essentially an integrated force."

Hagee, according to the journal, hinted that Detachment One would be around for awhile, at least, and would be available for future special operations missions.

"We are going to provide those capabilities that Gen. Brown needs," Hagee said of the special operations commander, Gen. Doug Brown. "If they need a capability such as Detachment One, that capability is going to go to them, and they will use that capability."
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2005, 10:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
Air Force

 
Rusty24's Avatar
 
Group:
Second Lieutenant

Rusty24Air Force is Rusty24 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 3,128
Threads: 401
UserID: 136
User Info
United_States  air_force  male  pisces  chinese_dragon

My current mood: Moody
Reputation +/-Power: 0
Points: 0
Rusty24 is an unknown quantity at this point
Rusty24Air Force is Rusty24 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  

Re: New SOCOM Detachment

This was e-mailed to me today



Rusty24's Sig:*

Rusty24 isimli üyemiz çevrimdışıdır. (Offline)  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
detachment, socom



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



New To The Site? Need Information?

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Alpha 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Designed by MilitaryDesign.Com
MilitaryLtd.com, GoInfantry.Com, Infantrymen.Net, Infantrymen's Military Forum are © 2000-2008 MilitaryLtd.Com. All Rights Reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents or images without express written consent is expressly prohibited.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253