Home Portal News Links
Go Back   Military Forum > Military Forums: General Discussion > Armed Forces Discussions > Navy Forums > Surface Warfare

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2005, 11:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
Marine
MSgt USMC Ret

 
USMCRET6391's Avatar
 
Group:
Lieutenant General

USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 is offline
AKA: Top
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,528
Threads: 3535
UserID: 69
User Info
United_States  marine_corps  male  taurus  

My current mood: Happy
Reputation +/-Power: 20
Points: 276
USMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the roughUSMCRET6391 is a jewel in the rough
USMCRET6391Marine is USMCRET6391 is offline  

DD(X) gets go-ahead

By Christopher P. Cavas
Times staff writer

The Navy’s futuristic DD(X) destroyer program passed a major milestone Nov. 23 when a key Pentagon review board gave the project the go-ahead to begin construction.

The Defense Acquisition Board also approved the Navy’s dual-shipyard construction strategy to have Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics build the first two ships at the same time.

The controversial move, proposed earlier this year by former Navy acquisition chief John Young as another cost-reduction effort, calls for the first two ships to be built simultaneously at Northrop’s Ingalls yard in Pascagoula, Miss., and General Dynamics’ Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine. After that, Young said earlier this year, the Navy would evaluate the shipbuilders and could choose to award all later ships to only one shipyard.

Pentagon acquisition undersecretary Ken Krieg’s Milestone B approval of the project allows the project to enter its System Development and Demonstration phase, which includes detail design and construction.

The Navy is expected to ask for funds to begin building the ships in fiscal 2007, when the proposed budget is submitted to Congress in February.

The DAB review of the destroyer program had been delayed several times. Most recently, the board met Nov. 10, but no decision was issued. Further meetings between the board and the Navy were held late Nov. 22, and Krieg approved the project Wednesday morning.

The shipbuilding plan submitted to Congress last February called for only one DD(X) to be included in the 2007 and 2008 budgets, but Young altered the strategy this spring in a move the Navy hopes will increase competition between the shipbuilders and bring down or hold construction costs.

Pentagon approval of the DD(X) team’s design work and the Navy’s new acquisition strategy was greeted by relief by the service and Northrop Grumman.

“The Navy is pleased that Secretary Krieg has allowed it to continue to move forward with DD(X) and the dual lead ship acquisition strategy,” the service said in a statement released Nov. 23. “We believe that this is the best way ahead for DoD, the Navy, industry and the American taxpayer.”

Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, which until September had led a “national team” of contractors developing the destroyer, also was upbeat.

“With the Milestone B approval, we in industry are moving ahead with the Navy today to take a very mature program into detailed design and a construction schedule,” said Ship Systems spokesman Brian Cullin. “We are committed to seeing this ship through to reality.”

The Navy hopes to build between five and eight DD(X) destroyers, and has estimated the cost of the first few ships at $3.3 billion apiece. But in testimony to Congress last summer, several government analysts pegged the real price for the program’s first ships at $4 billion or even higher.

-Top
USMCRET6391 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

» Support the Site!

Military Clothing - Military Gear - Military Ltd Gear - Infantrymen Gear - Ranger Gear - Single Servicemen
Reply

Tags
ddx, goahead


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



New To The Site? Need Information?

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., SEO by vBSEO
Designed by MilitaryLtd.Com
MilitaryLtd.com, GoInfantry.Com, Infantrymen.Net, Infantrymen's Military Forum are Copyright ©2000 - , MilitaryLtd.Com. All Rights Reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents or images without express written consent is expressly prohibited.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245